Most of the strong payware designers can get their creations to fly "by the numbers" but the illusion falls apart when you do things that you shouldn't (or wouldn't) in the real world.
#Level d 767 fsx liveries simulator#
My impression is that civilian flight simulators in general seem to do a poor job of modeling edge-of-envelope performance and behavior (DCS, however, does a great job-as is probably befitting of a simulator where flying on the edge is somewhat routine).
#Level d 767 fsx liveries plus#
If I could have only one of the above, I’d take the 757 in a close call over the IXEG (I'm just not a huge fan of the 737 in general).Ī note on flight modeling: I'm a real-world pilot, though my experience is limited to single engine aircraft (mostly recip plus a bit of VFR turbine time in a PC-12). It’s a do-everything beast of an airliner. My current all-around favorite, but that’s in part because I really love the 757 airframe. Oddly enough, it seems easier to land than the 767, which is reportedly the opposite of how it should be in reality. iPad config menu is cool and works well.īetter than the LD767? Yeah, easily…but it’s also 10+ years newer.įF757v2: airframe differences aside, everything said above about the 767 applies here…though the 757 is just a bit better in various ways (texture modeling, sound, etc). Sound modeling is good, but not great-the good news is that it’s easy to fix a lot of that (I replaced the horrible robotic flight attendant with real cabin announcements, for example). Systems modeling is very good, though the CDU behaves in a few weird ways (e.g. I really wish it was a 737-700, because I like that airframe better (it has transcon range and relatively modern avionics the 737 Classic doesn’t), but hey.įF767: this was the airplane that converted me to XP-the first fairly modern airliner I saw or used in XP that I thought could stand up to the better stuff in the FSX/P3D world (it was released about a year ago). Excellent frame rates.Ī lot of fun and worth the money even in its current state.
Lua/Gizmo failures) that render the airplane partially inoperable. For example: the still-incomplete PROG page on the CDU, certain CDU inputs cause the entire system to lag/stutter, and I’ve experienced a fair number of soft crashes (i.e. Inferior to the FF75/76 and PMDG products in system modeling, mostly because it’s buggy and missing features. IXEG733: best-in-sim-world sound, visual, and flight modeling…better than FF and better than PMDG. I liked it quite a bit in FS9, but it’s well past its prime now.
Flight Sim Internet RadioĪVSIM Library (freeware - account required) More about our rules can be found here: /r/flightsim/about/rules.
0 kommentar(er)
